Alex Hunsaker <bada...@gmail.com> writes:
> On Tue, Mar 10, 2015 at 10:11 AM, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
>> This thread seems to have died off without any clear resolution. I'd
>> hoped somebody would try the patch on some nontrivial application to
>> see if it broke anything or caused any warnings, but it doesn't seem
>> like that is happening.
> I tried it on a fairly typical web application. Around 5000 or so distinct
> statements according to pg_stat_statements. With
> operator_precedence_warning = on, no warnings yet.
Thanks! Much appreciated.
regards, tom lane
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
