Michael Paquier wrote: > On Tue, Mar 10, 2015 at 10:48 PM, Alvaro Herrera > <alvhe...@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:
> > How do we go about getting these patches pushed? > > I think that one of the last point raised (by Andres) was if the > Makefiles in src/bin should depend on pgxs.mk or not. FWIW, I think as > well that it should be a subsequent patch not related to this one as > it is a different debate to have stuff of src/bin depend on contrib > infrastructure. I don't think we care one bit whether these modules use pgxs, at least not currently. If we find any issues later on, it should be an easy fix anyway. > Now, the pushing plan was to have the stuff of pg_upgrade done in a > separate commit. Note that I am fine helping out wrapping up things > particularly on Windows if that helps. I vote for moving one module per commmit. Probably the first commit will be the hardest one to get right, so let's pick an easy module -- say, pgbench. That way there are less gotchas hopefully. Once we have that working everywhere we look into moving another one. > > Note that each utility we move to src/bin will create a new translatable > > module for 9.5. It would be better to do it soon rather than waiting at > > the very end of the cycle, so that translators have time to work through > > the bunch of extra files. > > That's a point. I'm a translator ;-) -- Álvaro Herrera http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
