On 3/12/15 10:07 AM, Andres Freund wrote: > I actually wonder if it'd not make more sense to define it as the > physical column number. That'd reduce the invasiveness and risk of the > patch considerably.
Clearly, the number of places where attnum has to be changed to something else is not zero, and so it doesn't matter if a lot or a few have to be changed. They all have to be looked at and considered. -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
