On Sun, Mar 15, 2015 at 2:27 PM, Andres Freund <and...@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:
> On 2015-03-12 15:52:02 +0100, Andres Freund wrote: > > /* > > * Override any inconsistent requests. Not that this is a change > > * of behaviour in 9.5; prior to this we simply ignored a request > > * to pause if hot_standby = off, which was surprising behaviour. > > */ > > if (recoveryTargetAction == RECOVERY_TARGET_ACTION_PAUSE && > > recoveryTargetActionSet && > > standbyState == STANDBY_DISABLED) > > recoveryTargetAction = RECOVERY_TARGET_ACTION_SHUTDOWN; > > While it's easy enough to fix I rather dislike the whole intent here > though. *Silently* switching the mode of operation in a rather > significant way seems like a bad idea to me. At the very least we need > to emit a LOG message about this; but I think it'd be much better to > error out instead. > > <9.5's behaviour was already quite surprising. But changing things to a > different surprising behaviour seems like a bad idea. > +1. Especially for "sensitive" operations like this, having predictable-behavior-or-error is usually the best choice. -- Magnus Hagander Me: http://www.hagander.net/ Work: http://www.redpill-linpro.com/