On 2015-03-19 12:50:09 +0000, Kevin Grittner wrote: > For me the big question is whether software written to retry a > transaction from the beginning when it gets this SQLSTATE would be > doing something dumb to retry transactions (perhaps after a brief > delay) for the conflict with recovery. If using the same automated > recovery techniques is sane, then IMO it makes sense to use the > same SQLSTATE.
Yes, it imo makes sense to use the same techniques. In both cases you need to keep enough state to give up at some point; the combination of running transactions might make the likelihood of succeeding too low. Greetings, Andres Freund -- Andres Freund http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
