On Mon, Oct 6, 2014 at 03:49:37PM +0200, Feike Steenbergen wrote: > On 6 October 2014 14:09, Michael Paquier <michael.paqu...@gmail.com> wrote: > > That's a good catch and it should be a separate patch. This could even be > > considered for a back-patch down to 9.2. Thoughts? > > If I isolate "DROP INDEX concurrently", this patch would do the trick.
Patch applied for 9.5. Thanks. -- Bruce Momjian <br...@momjian.us> http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com + Everyone has their own god. + -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
