On Fri, Feb 27, 2015 at 08:42:29AM -0800, David Fetter wrote: > On Mon, Feb 23, 2015 at 05:56:12PM -0300, Alvaro Herrera wrote: > > > > David Fetter wrote: > > > > > My thinking behind this was that the patch is a bug fix and intended > > > to be back-patched, so I wanted to mess with as little infrastructure > > > as possible. A new version of libpq seems like a very big ask for > > > such a case. You'll recall that the original problem was that > > > > > > \c service=foo > > > > > > only worked accidentally for some pretty narrow use cases and broke > > > without much of a clue for the rest. It turned out that the general > > > problem was that options given to psql on the command line were not > > > even remotely equivalent to \c, even though they were documented to > > > be. > > > > So, in view of these arguments and those put forward by Pavel > > downthread, I think the attached is an acceptable patch for the master > > branch. It doesn't apply to back branches though; 9.4 and 9.3 have a > > conflict in tab-complete.c, 9.2 has additional conflicts in command.c, > > and 9.1 and 9.0 are problematic all over because they don't have > > src/common. Could you please submit patches adapted for each group of > > branches? > > Please find patches attached for each live branch.
Is this getting into the upcoming bug fix releases? Does it need rework to do so? Cheers, David. -- David Fetter <da...@fetter.org> http://fetter.org/ Phone: +1 415 235 3778 AIM: dfetter666 Yahoo!: dfetter Skype: davidfetter XMPP: david.fet...@gmail.com Remember to vote! Consider donating to Postgres: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
