Christopher Kings-Lynne wrote:
I think this would be a good idea, though there becomes a question of
what type of performance hit comes into play when doing this. I suppose
if you have an option whether to encrypt it or not that would help.  One
other thing is that it needs to be "decryptable" by owners and
superusers.
Surely a more generic column privileges implementation would be better?
I think column privileges is orthogonal to this issue. The ability to "protect" stored procedure or package source is common among at least the commercial databases I've worked with (as is column level grants).

Joe


---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 3: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate
subscribe-nomail command to [EMAIL PROTECTED] so that your
message can get through to the mailing list cleanly


Reply via email to