Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> writes:
> On Thu, Apr 2, 2015 at 3:59 PM, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
>> Perhaps the difference has to do with whether pg_am's pg_class tuple is
>> on a page that hasn't got enough room for a HOT update? But I definitely
>> tried it several times and consistently got the same failure before.
> That seems plausible, except that I have no idea why that would vary
> from one test setup to another. I suggest pushing the patch you
> proposed upthread and seeing what the buildfarm thinks.
Yeah. I have errands to do right now but will push it later.
regards, tom lane
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
