On 03/15/2015 09:07 PM, Petr Jelinek wrote:
Slightly updated version of the patch.
Mainly rebased against current master (there were several conflicts) and
fixed some typos, no real functional change.
I also attached initial version of the API sgml doc.
Thanks!
With the patch, pg_class.relam column references to the pg_seqam table
for sequences, but pg_indexam for indexes. I believe it's the first
instance where we reuse a "foreign key" column like that. It's not a
real foreign key, of course - that wouldn't work with a real foreign key
at all - but it's a bit strange. That makes me a bit uncomfortable. How
do others feel about that?
- Heikki
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
