Joe Conway writes: > That is one thing I'd like to take a look at. I think the problem is that > certain byte-sequence/multibyte-encoding combinations are illegal, so it's not > as simple an issue as it might first appear.
The bytea type really shouldn't come even close to having to care about this. Actually, if you want to improve the ugly bytea literal syntax, implement the standard BLOB type. -- Peter Eisentraut [EMAIL PROTECTED] ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 3: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate subscribe-nomail command to [EMAIL PROTECTED] so that your message can get through to the mailing list cleanly
