On Wed, Apr 22, 2015 at 8:40 PM, Heikki Linnakangas <hlinn...@iki.fi> wrote: > On 04/20/2015 05:21 AM, Michael Paquier wrote: >> >> I have just made a run of the TAP tests of pg_rewind on my raspberry >> PI 1 (hamster), where the tests are very slow, and I noticed that it >> takes up to 10s to get confirmation from standby that it has caught up >> with the changes from master, and 5s to get confirmation that standby >> has been promoted. So the tests in HEAD would be broken without this >> patch, and 30s gives visibly enough room. > > > Ok, applied, with some refactoring: I put the sleep-retry loop into a > separate function.
Thanks. -- Michael -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
