On Thu, Apr 23, 2015 at 1:35 AM, Kyotaro HORIGUCHI <
horiguchi.kyot...@lab.ntt.co.jp> wrote:

> Very sorry for the trash..
>
> ===
> Now I found a comment at just where I patched,
>
> >  * XXX if the typinput function is not immutable, we really ought to
> >  * postpone evaluation of the function call until runtime. But there
> >  * is no way to represent a typinput function call as an expression
> >  * tree, because C-string values are not Datums. (XXX This *is*
> >  * possible as of 7.3, do we want to do it?)
>
> - Is it OK to *now* we can do this?
> + Is it OK to regard that we can do this *now*?
>
>
In this patch or a different one?  Does this comment have anything to do
with the concern of this thread?

David J.
‚Äč

Reply via email to