On Wed, 4 Dec 2002, Tom Lane wrote: > "Dave Page" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > I'll preempt the 'this was all discussed on -advocacy, you should have > > been there' response with yet another agreement with Vince :-) - I too > > am getting far too much mail these days and another list is the last > > thing I need. > > I'm not subscribed to -advocacy either. I'm a little disturbed to hear > that major decisions seem to be getting taken there without any mention > in -hackers.
Everything that is discussed on -advocacy is generally that which is dealing with the advocacy web site ... case studies and such ... there are no "major decisions" being made over there ... in my case, it was a small pool of ppl interested in advocacy/marketing that I could draw on to write a stronger, less techie oriented, press release around ... I have a list of 350+ contacts that I used to get it out through, in various fields (university, publishing, etc) and needed something a little bit more at that level then I've been able to create in the past ... Most, if not all, of the stuff going through -advocacy is, right now, revolving around keeping track of the various press links that ppl find on the 'Net, which are to be added to the various sites that are currently being developed ... as well as a point of contact for liason'ng with companies willing/able to write and publish case studies ... ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 4: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster
