On Fri, May 1, 2015 at 2:36 PM, Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Fri, May 1, 2015 at 4:53 PM, Jim Nasby <jim.na...@bluetreble.com> wrote: >> ISTR a comment to the effect of the SQL standard effectively requires >> current behavior. > > I'd be astonished. The SQL standard doesn't even know that there is > such a thing as an index, so I presume it doesn't dictate the behavior > of the query planner either.
I agree. Somehow, the idea that this is within the standard caught on, but I'm almost certain it's false. -- Peter Geoghegan -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
