Emre Hasegeli wrote: > > After looking at 05 again, I don't like the "same as %" business. > > Creating a whole new class of exceptions is not my thing, particularly > > not in a regression test whose sole purpose is to look for exceptional > > (a.k.a. "wrong") cases. I would much rather define the opclasses for > > those two datatypes using the existing @> operators rather than create > > && operators for this purpose. We can add a note to the docs, "for > > historical reasons the brin opclass for datatype box/point uses the <@ > > operator instead of &&", or something like that. > > I worked around this by adding point <@ box operator as the overlap > strategy and removed additional && operators.
That works for me. I pushed patches 04 and 07, as well as adopting some of the changes to the regression test in 06. I'm afraid I caused a bit of merge pain for you -- sorry about that. -- Álvaro Herrera http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
