Pavel Stehule <pavel.steh...@gmail.com> writes:
> 2015-05-07 20:18 GMT+02:00 Fabien COELHO <coe...@cri.ensmp.fr>:
>> The attached patch just ignores a leading '=' in a pgbench expression.
> It is question :( - it break a consistency with psql
I've got doubts about this too: it introduces fundamental inconsistency
in pgbench itself, which may come back to bite us later. Who's to say
that '=' will never be a meaningful operator in pgbench expressions?
regards, tom lane
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
