On 04/17/2015 12:05 PM, Alexander Korotkov wrote:
On Wed, Feb 25, 2015 at 12:15 PM, Alexander Korotkov <aekorot...@gmail.com>
wrote:
Hi!
On Tue, Feb 24, 2015 at 5:39 PM, Tomas Vondra <
tomas.von...@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:
On 17.2.2015 14:21, Alexander Korotkov wrote:
On Sun, Feb 15, 2015 at 2:08 PM, Alexander Korotkov
<aekorot...@gmail.com <mailto:aekorot...@gmail.com>> wrote:
Revised patch with reordering in GiST is attached
(knn-gist-recheck-in-gist.patch) as well as testing script (test.py).
I meant to do a bit of testing on this (assuming it's still needed), but
the patches need rebasing - Heikki fixed a few issues, so they don't
apply cleanly.
Both patches are revised.
Both patches are rebased against current master.
This looks pretty much ready. I'm going to spend some time on this on
Friday, and if all looks good, commit. (Thursday's a public holiday here).
One quick comment:
It would be good to avoid the extra comparisons of the distances, when
the index doesn't return any lossy items. As the patch stands, it adds
one extra copyDistances() call and a cmp_distances() call for each tuple
(in a knn-search), even if there are no lossy tuples.
- Heikki
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
