On Thu, May 14, 2015 at 06:57:24PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote: > Stephen Frost <sfr...@snowman.net> writes: > > * Bruce Momjian (br...@momjian.us) wrote: > >> I will call for a vote that the freeze deadline be changed if this patch > >> is rejected to due to time. I might lose the vote, but I am going to > >> try because if we lose our reputation for fairness, we have lost a lot > >> more than a week/month of release time. > > > I'm guessing the vote is core-only, but +1 from me in any case. I fully > > agree that this patch has had a serious measure of effort put behind it > > from the author and is absolutely a capability we desire and need to > > have in core. > > I should think we'd have learned by now what happens when we delay a > release date to get in some extra feature. It hasn't worked well in > the past and I see no reason to believe the results would be any more > desirable this time.
Right, the importance of the feature is not a reason to delay the feature freeze. -- Bruce Momjian <br...@momjian.us> http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com + Everyone has their own god. + -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
