Andrew Gierth <[email protected]> writes:
> "Tom" == Tom Lane <[email protected]> writes:
> Tom> So I'm all for refactoring, but I think it will happen as a natural
> Tom> byproduct of path-ification, and otherwise would be rather forced.
> Hrm, ok. So for the near future, we should leave it more or less as-is?
> We don't have a timescale yet, but it's our intention to submit a
> hashagg support patch for grouping sets as soon as time permits.
Well, mumble. I keep saying that I want to tackle path-ification in
that area, and I keep not finding the time to actually do it. So I'm
hesitant to tell you that you should wait on it. But certainly I think
that it'll be a lot easier to get hashagg costing done in that framework
than in what currently exists.
regards, tom lane
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list ([email protected])
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
