> As proposed, this feature does not bring us really closer to quorum > commit, and AFAIK this is what we are more or less aiming at recalling > previous discussions. Particularly with the syntax proposed above, it > is not possible to do some OR conditions on subgroups of nodes, the > list of nodes is forcibly using AND because it is necessary to wait > for all the subgroups. Also, users may want to track nodes from the > same group with different application_name.
The patch assumes that all standbys of a group share a name and so the "OR" condition would be taken care of that way. Also, since uniqueness of standby_name cannot be enforced, the same name could be repeated across groups!. Regards, Beena ----- -- Beena Emerson -- View this message in context: http://postgresql.nabble.com/Support-for-N-synchronous-standby-servers-take-2-tp5849384p5849712.html Sent from the PostgreSQL - hackers mailing list archive at Nabble.com. -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
