On 2015-05-18 14:13:51 -0300, Alvaro Herrera wrote: > Hmm, AFAICS the problematic check was introduced by this commit: > > commit 9f1e051adefb2f29e757cf426b03db20d3f8a26d > Author: Alvaro Herrera <alvhe...@alvh.no-ip.org> > Date: Fri Nov 29 11:26:41 2013 -0300 > > so it isn't hot off the oven, but it is a regression.
Hasn't that just changed the symptoms? I don't recall exactly, but my recollection is that the multixact code isn't ready at that point and hasn't initialized a bunch of important variables yet. Leading to errors in the SLRU etc. Greetings, Andres Freund -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
