-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: RIPEMD160
Dave Cramer opined: > It would seem that choosing ? for operators was ill advised; I'm not > convinced that deprecating them is a bad idea. If we start now, in 5 years > they should be all but gone Ha ha ha ha ha! That's a good one. We still have clients on Postgres 7! Five years is way too short to replace something that major. > Agreed a patch would be the first place to start That, or just running the idea up the flagpole on -general. I'm a fairly strong -1 at the moment, but will listen to arguments. - -- Greg Sabino Mullane g...@turnstep.com End Point Corporation http://www.endpoint.com/ PGP Key: 0x14964AC8 201505191448 http://biglumber.com/x/web?pk=2529DF6AB8F79407E94445B4BC9B906714964AC8 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iEYEAREDAAYFAlVbhfcACgkQvJuQZxSWSsguxwCgrMPQKa9tTfMcuv4jRnqM6mNg OvAAmgLNpa2vsiv+bkd7p4bUEx7op9ax =sr9j -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
