Heikki Linnakangas <hlinn...@iki.fi> writes:
> Thanks, committed. Except for this one:
> - * *Only* a frozen-for-read tape can be seeked.
> + * *Only* a frozen-for-read tape can be sought.
> It's true that the past tense of "seek" is "sought", but it feels a bit
> weird to me in this context. This is a comment on a function called
> "<blah blah>seek", and it's not clear to me that it should conjugate
> like the normal "seek" verb.
I agree that "sought" is not the word to use here, but the existing
wording isn't very good English either. Perhaps "Seeking is only allowed
on frozen-for-read tapes"?
regards, tom lane
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
