On 5/26/15 8:31 PM, Andres Freund wrote: > I actually think both are relatively easy to figure out without a > typedef list. There's harder cases though, e.g. (char *) &foo in an > expression is already more complicated.
Well, if you know of a way to fix this, let's see it. Others have been trying for 20+ years. -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
