2015-05-29 10:37 GMT+02:00 Dave Page <dp...@pgadmin.org>: > On Fri, May 29, 2015 at 7:27 AM, Pavel Stehule <pavel.steh...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > > > > 2015-05-29 8:20 GMT+02:00 Guillaume Lelarge <guilla...@lelarge.info>: > >> > >> Le 29 mai 2015 8:10 AM, "Pavel Stehule" <pavel.steh...@gmail.com> a > écrit > >> : > >> > > >> > Hi > >> > > >> > I am not sure if PGXN can substitute contrib - mainly due deployment - > >> > It doesn't helps with MS Windows. Installing necessary software for > >> > compilation there is terrible. > >> > > >> > >> I agree it's hard to compile an extension on Windows, but that's already > >> what we have. And I'm sure EDB will put all interesting contrib modules > in > >> their windows installer to help users. They already go way further than > any > >> Linux packages. > > > > I afraid so dependency on EDB in this case is wrong - I have respect to > EDB > > due work, but installation other extension from EDB stack is difficult, > > unclean, and nothing what I would to use as new base. > > The five or six mouse clicks required to install something like Slony > or PostGIS (or both at once) is difficult and unclean? >
I had a problem with downloading isolated packages with stackbuilder - but it was specific, because comp where some packages was installed was not access to internet. > > -- > Dave Page > Blog: http://pgsnake.blogspot.com > Twitter: @pgsnake > > EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com > The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company >
