On 2015-06-03 18:54:24 +0800, Craig Ringer wrote: > OK, here we go. Hm. Wouldn't random sampling be better than what you do? If your queries have a pattern to them (e.g. you always issue the same 10 queries in succession), this will possibly only show a subset of the queries.
I think a formulation in fraction (i.e. a float between 0 and 1) will also be easier to understand. Andres -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
