On Thu, Jun 4, 2015 at 12:10 PM, Peter Geoghegan <p...@heroku.com> wrote: >> But I agree that it's not a great contribution to science, especially since >> the index will be applied to the list of elements in the somewhat >> counter-intuitive storage order we use, and we could just raise an error if >> we try to apply integer delete to an object instead of an array. > > Cool. Do you want to write a patch, or should I? > > Also, what about negative array subscripting (making the 9.4-era > "operator jsonb -> integer" operator support that for consistency with > the new "operator jsonb - integer" operator)? Should I write the > patch? Will you commit it if I do?
Please let me know if you want me to write these two patches. -- Peter Geoghegan -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
