Philip Warner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> At 03:54 PM 9/12/2002 -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
>> FSM entries aren't needed for sequences either, so more correct is
>>
>> select count(*) from pg_class where relkind in ('r', 't');
> presumably:
> select count(*) from pg_class where relkind in ('r', 't', 'i');
No, I meant what I said. Indexes don't use the FSM. (The premise of
the FSM is that one bit of free space in a table is as good as any other
bit; a premise quite incorrect for indexes.)
regards, tom lane
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 4: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster
