Noah Misch <n...@leadboat.com> writes:
> On Thu, Jun 11, 2015 at 03:41:49PM -0500, Merlin Moncure wrote:
>> On Thu, Jun 11, 2015 at 3:12 PM, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
>>> In any case, we oughta use two different error messages for the two cases,
>>> as per my comment in the above thread. That seems like a back-patchable
>>> bug fix, though of course any semantics change should only be in HEAD.
>> I have a slight preference to keep it to tightening up the wording on
>> both the hint and the error (for example, "Perhaps you meant USING
>> foo::type?") but leaving the behavior alone.
> +1. The HINT could certainly provide situation-specific help.
Fair enough, I'll go fix that but leave the semantics alone.
regards, tom lane
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
