On Fri, Jun 26, 2015 at 2:59 PM, Amit Langote wrote: > Do we really need to add a number like '1' in '1(a, b), c, d'? > The order of writing names already implies priorities like 2 & 3 for c & d, > respectively, like in your example. Having to write '1' for the group '(a, b)' > seems unnecessary, IMHO. Sorry if I have missed any previous discussion where > its necessity was discussed.
'1' is implied if no number is specified. That's the idea as written here, not something decided of course :) > So, the order of writing standby names in the list should declare their > relative priorities and parentheses (possibly nested) should help inform about > the grouping (for quorum?) Yes. -- Michael -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
