Alvaro Herrera <alvhe...@2ndquadrant.com> writes: > Alvaro Herrera wrote: >> Tom Lane wrote: >>> Andres Freund <and...@anarazel.de> writes: >>>> Uh. I'm pretty sure there were some back when that patch went in. And >>>> there definitely used to be a couple earlier. I guess itanium really is >>>> dying (mixed bad: It's a horrible architecture, but more coverage would >>>> still be good).
>>> Since that machine is run by EDB, maybe we could persuade them to set up >>> a second critter on it that uses gcc. That would at least help narrow >>> down whether it's a compiler-specific issue. >> I pinged EDB about this several days ago, and they have now set up >> buildfarm member gharial running on the same machine, using gcc. > FWIW gharial does not show any problem whatsoever. I'd hoped that commit 1b468a131bd260c9041484f78b8580c7f232d580 would resolve this, but nope, anole is still getting occasional stuck spinlocks: http://buildfarm.postgresql.org/cgi-bin/show_log.pl?nm=anole&dt=2015-06-28%2021%3A35%3A02 regards, tom lane -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
