> 28 июня 2015 г., в 21:46, Heikki Linnakangas <hlinn...@iki.fi> написал(а):
> 
> On 06/24/2015 09:43 AM, Michael Paquier wrote:
>> Attached is a new set of patches. Except for the last ones that
>> addresses one issue of pg_rewind (symlink management when streaming
>> PGDATA), all the others introduce if_not_exists options for the
>> functions of genfile.c. The pg_rewind stuff could be more polished
>> though. Feel free to comment.
> 
> I've committed the additional option to the functions in genfile.c (I renamed 
> it to "missing_ok", for clarity), and the pg_rewind changes to use that 
> option.

And since it changes API it would not be back-ported to 9.4, right?

> 
> I ended up refactoring the patch quite a bit, so if you could double-check 
> what I committed to make sure I didn't break anything, that would be great.
> 
> I didn't commit the tablespace or symlink handling changes yet, will review 
> those separately.
> 
> I also didn't commit the new regression test yet. It would indeed be nice to 
> have one, but I think it was a few bricks shy of a load. It should work in a 
> freshly initdb'd system, but not necessarily on an existing installation. 
> First, it relied on the fact that postgresql.conf.auto exists, but a DBA 
> might remove that if he wants to make sure the feature is not used. Secondly, 
> it relied on the fact that pg_twophase is empty, but there is no guarantee of 
> that either. Third, the error messages included in the expected output, e.g 
> "No such file or directory", depend on the operating system and locale. And 
> finally, it'd be nice to test more things, in particular the behaviour of 
> different offsets and lengths to pg_read_binary_file(), although an 
> incomplete test would be better than no test at all.
> 
> - Heikki
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
> To make changes to your subscription:
> http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers


--
May the force be with you…
https://simply.name

Reply via email to