Petr Jelinek <p...@2ndquadrant.com> writes:
> On 2015-06-30 09:10, Michael Paquier wrote:
>> If the expression argstate is NULL when calling ExecInitExpr(), argstate
>> is going to be NULL and dereferenced afterwards, see execQual.c for more
>> details. Hence I think that the patch attached should be applied. Thoughts?

> Well, yes the ExecEvalExpr should be in the else block if we'd keep the 
> NULL logic there.

> However after rereading the code, ISTM the ExecInitExpr will only return 
> NULL if the argexpr is NULL and argexpr is added by ParseTableSample 
> using the transformExpr on every argument which comes from grammar and 
> those are a_exprs which AFAIK will never be NULL. So I actually think 
> that the argstate can never be NULL in practice.

Indeed.  ParseTableSample() is badly in need of a rewrite, but I agree
that it's not going to produce null expression trees.

> Patch attached.

Will push this shortly.

                        regards, tom lane


-- 
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers

Reply via email to