Perhaps compression should be added to the list of protocol changes. This way, we can allow for per packet evaluation for compression.
-- Greg Copeland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Copeland Computer Consulting On Tue, 2002-12-10 at 21:50, Bruce Momjian wrote: > Tom Lane wrote: > > Ian Barwick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > Sounds good to me. Is it on the todo-list? (Couldn't see it there). > > > > Probably not; Bruce for some reason has resisted listing protocol change > > desires as an identifiable TODO category. There are a couple of threads > > in the pghackers archives over the last year or so that discuss the > > different things we want to do, though. (Improving the error-reporting > > framework and fixing the COPY protocol are a couple of biggies I can > > recall offhand.) > > Listing protocol changes seemed too low-level for the TODO list, but I > have kept the email messages. Today I updated the TODO list and added a > section for them. ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 3: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate subscribe-nomail command to [EMAIL PROTECTED] so that your message can get through to the mailing list cleanly
