On Wed, Jul 1, 2015 at 1:38 PM, Simon Riggs <si...@2ndquadrant.com> wrote: > > On 1 July 2015 at 09:00, Amit Kapila <amit.kapil...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> >> I think it will be better to partition it or use it in some other way to avoid >> two concurrent writers block at it, however if you want to first see the >> test results with this, then that is also okay. > > > Many updates would be on same page, so partitioning it would need to be at least 4-way to be worth doing. Maybe we could stripe into 512 bye pages. >
Sure, it makes sense to try that way, once you have that ready, I can try this out along with ProcArrayLock patch to see the impact. With Regards, Amit Kapila. EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
