Andres Freund <> writes:
> On 2015-07-01 10:51:49 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
>> The problem is that there are multiple risks to manage here.  If I were to
>> back-patch that patch, it would actively break any third-party extensions
>> that might be using the formerly-considered-valid technique of passing a
>> NULL array pointer to these lookup functions.  We don't like breaking
>> things in minor releases; that discourages people from updating to new
>> minor releases.

> Yep, let's just fix it in master (and potentially 9.5, I don't care).

It's in the 9.5 branch already.

                        regards, tom lane

Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (
To make changes to your subscription:

Reply via email to