Andres Freund <and...@anarazel.de> writes: > On 2015-07-01 10:51:49 -0400, Tom Lane wrote: >> The problem is that there are multiple risks to manage here. If I were to >> back-patch that patch, it would actively break any third-party extensions >> that might be using the formerly-considered-valid technique of passing a >> NULL array pointer to these lookup functions. We don't like breaking >> things in minor releases; that discourages people from updating to new >> minor releases.
> Yep, let's just fix it in master (and potentially 9.5, I don't care). It's in the 9.5 branch already. regards, tom lane -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (email@example.com) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers