On Wed, Jul 1, 2015 at 11:45 PM, Peter Eisentraut <pete...@gmx.net> wrote:
> On 6/26/15 1:46 AM, Michael Paquier wrote:
>> - k(elt1,elt2,eltN) means that we need for the k elements in the set
>> to return true (aka commit confirmation).
>> - k[elt1,elt2,eltN] means that we need for the first k elements in the
>> set to return true.
>
> I think the difference between (...) and [...] is not intuitive. To me,
> {...} would be more intuitive to indicate order does not matter.
When defining a set of elements {} defines elements one by one, () and
[] are used for ranges. Perhaps the difference is better this way.
>> When k is not defined for a group, k = 1.
>
> How about putting it at the end? Like
>
> [foo,bar,baz](2)
I am less convinced by that, now I won't argue against it either.
--
Michael
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
