Alvaro Herrera <alvhe...@2ndquadrant.com> wrote: > Peter Geoghegan wrote:
>> It would be nice to always have a html report from gcov always >> available on the internet. That would be something useful to >> automate, IMV. > > http://pgci.eisentraut.org/jenkins/job/postgresql_master_coverage/Coverage/ What would it take to get something like that which uses the check-world target instead of just the check target? Without the additional tests (like the isolation tests), some of these numbers don't reflect the coverage of regularly run tests. While it is of some interest what coverage we get on the 30 second `make check` runs, I would be a lot more interested in what our coverage is when the full 8.5 minute set of regression tests we have in git is run. -- Kevin Grittner EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
