On Wed, Jul 8, 2015 at 6:16 PM, Andres Freund wrote: >> In any case, we are going to need at least (void) in front of those calls. > > We're "needing" nothing of the sort.
I don't really understand your reluctance here. As one example, see c831593 where similar fixes are done and even back-patched. -- Michael -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
