On July 10, 2015 4:16:59 PM GMT+02:00, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: >Andres Freund <and...@anarazel.de> writes: >> I think we should copy the SCHEMA option here and document that we >use >> the same schema. But it needs to be done in a way that doesn't error >out >> if the extension is not relocatable... > >Would that propagate down through multiple levels of CASCADE? >(Although >I'm not sure it would be sensible for a non-relocatable extension to >depend on a relocatable one, so maybe the need doesn't arise in >practice.)
I'd day so. I was thinking it'd adding a flag that allows to pass a schema to a non relocatable extension. That'd then be passed down. I agree that it's unlikely to be used often. Andres --- Please excuse brevity and formatting - I am writing this on my mobile phone. -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
