On Wed, 2015-07-15 at 12:59 +0530, Atri Sharma wrote:

> 
> I think a heuristic would be more suited here and ignoring memory
> consumption for internal types means that we are not making the memory
> accounting useful for a set of usecases. 
> 
OK, I will drop this patch and proceed with the HashAgg patch, with a
heuristic for internal types.

Regards,
        Jeff Davis





-- 
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers

Reply via email to