Le 23 juil. 2015 19:27, "Alvaro Herrera" <alvhe...@2ndquadrant.com> a écrit : > > Laurent Laborde wrote: > > > Friendly greetings ! > > > > What's the status of parallel clusterdb please ? > > I'm having fun (and troubles) applying the vacuumdb patch to clusterdb. > > > > This thread also talk about unifying code for parallelizing clusterdb and > > reindex. > > Was anything done about it ? Because i can't see it and my work currently > > involve a lot of copy/pasting from vacuumdb to clusterdb :) > > Honestly, I have to wonder whether there are really valid use cases for > clusterdb. Are you actually using it and want to see it improved, or is > this just an academical exercise?
Purely academical. I don't use it. > > And no, (i'm pretty sure) i don't have the required postgresql knowledge to > > do this unification if it isn't done already. > > You may or may not lack it *now*, but that doesn't mean you will > continue to lack it forever. That's why i'm working on it :) -- Laurent "ker2x" Laborde DBA \o/ gandi.net
