2015-07-21 16:58 GMT+02:00 Merlin Moncure <mmonc...@gmail.com>: > On Tue, Jul 21, 2015 at 2:53 AM, Heikki Linnakangas <hlinn...@iki.fi> > wrote: > > On 07/21/2015 10:38 AM, Pavel Stehule wrote: > >> > >> where we are with this patch? Can I do some for it? > > > > > > I still feel this approach is misguided, and we should be tweaking psql > > and/or libpq instead. I don't feel strongly though, and if some other > > committer wants to pick this up in its current form, I won't object. So > this > > patch has reached an impasse, and if no-one else wants to pick this up, > I'm > > going to mark this as "Returned with Feedback" and move on. > > That's unfortunate. Maybe I'm missing something: > > What does a client side implementation offer that a server side > implementation does not offer? >
I have not any problem to change the filtering to client side. Primary question is fix of PLpgSQL RAISE statement issue - The context field filtering is a necessary follow-up and trivial in both cases. In this case, it is acceptable for all? Regards Pavel > > merlin >
