On 07/18/2015 01:32 AM, Corey Huinker wrote:
So this patch would result in less C code while still adding 3 new
functions. Can anyone think of why that wouldn't be the best way to go?

Let's pursue the "CAST(srf() AS row_rtype)" syntax that Joe suggested upthread (http://www.postgresql.org/message-id/559a9643.9070...@joeconway.com). For some reason, the discussion went on around the details of the submitted patch after that, even though everyone seemed to prefer the CAST() syntax.

- Heikki



--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers

Reply via email to