On Wed, Jul 29, 2015 at 10:20 PM, Andres Freund <and...@anarazel.de> wrote: > On 2015-07-29 22:17:27 +0900, Michael Paquier wrote: >> Here is a patch implementing those things. IMO if-not-exists does not >> make much sense anymore > > What? It's rather useful to be able to discern between 'slot was already > there' and 'oops, some error occured'. -1
OK, fine. > To me the pg_recvlogical changes are pretty pointless. OK, you wrote it after all. I won't insist on it. So, perhaps the attached is more convincing then? It just changes --create-slot to leave immediately after creation to address the complain of this thread. -- Michael
20150730_pgrecv_slots_v2.patch
Description: binary/octet-stream
-- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
