=?ISO-8859-15?Q?Jos=E9_Luis_Tall=F3n?= <jltal...@adv-solutions.net> writes: > Since PostgreSQL lacks the resource management capabilities of the > "Big Ones" ( Resource Groups - Red, WorkLoad Manager - Blue ) or the > Resource Governor in MS SQL Server, we can try and approximate the > requested behaviour by reducing the CPU priority ("nice") of the backend > in question. Please note that we would be using scheduler priority to > try and modulate I/O, though I'm aware of the limitations of this mechanism.
This has been proposed before, and rejected before, and I'm not seeing anything particularly new here. Without a credible mechanism for throttling I/O, "nice" alone does not seem very promising. regards, tom lane -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers