On Sun, Aug 9, 2015 at 11:03 PM, Simon Riggs <si...@2ndquadrant.com> wrote: > If 5) fails to bring a workable solution by the Jan 2016 CF then we commit > 2) instead.
Is there actually a conflict there? I didn't think so. -- Peter Geoghegan -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
