* Tom Lane (t...@sss.pgh.pa.us) wrote: > I'm not entirely sure what to do about this. We could back-patch that > patch into 9.0 and 9.1, but it's conceivable somebody would squawk about > planner behavioral changes. The only other idea that seems practical is > to remove regression test cases that have platform-specific results in > those branches. Probably that wouldn't result in a real reduction in the > quality of the test coverage for those branches (we could still execute > the query, just not EXPLAIN it). But it seems like a pretty ad-hoc > answer, and the next case might be one that hurts more not to test. > > Thoughts?
Have an alternate file for those other cases, rather than remove the
test? The complaint was about one buildfarm member, so hopefully that's
practical and doesn't require a lot of different permutations.
Thanks!
Stephen
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
