On 08/20/2015 06:19 AM, David Fetter wrote: > On Thu, Aug 20, 2015 at 06:58:24PM +0900, Amit Langote wrote: >> Do you mean ATTACH and DETACH, if they require access exclusive lock on >> the parent, should not be in the first cut? Or am I misreading? > > Sorry I was unclear. > > ATTACH and DETACH should be in the first cut even if they require an > access exclusive lock. > > Cheers, > David.
I don't see a way for them to *ever* not require an access exclusive lock. We could eventually implement: DETACH PARTITION CONCURRENTLY ... but that's the only way I can see around it. -- Josh Berkus PostgreSQL Experts Inc. http://pgexperts.com -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
